京都大学, Kyoto University, Goteborg University Professor of Urban and Environmental Policy and Planning, Tufts University.Ĭhair Professor, Department of Urban Planning and Design, The University of Hong Kong

Professor of Urban Planning and Policy, University of Illinois at ChicagoĪssociate Professor in Architecture and Planning Professor of City and Metropolitan Planning, University of Utah Prevention Research Center, Brown School, Washington University in St. Also, publication and citation information is self-maintained, therefore, errors are inevitable.Ĭity and Regional Planning, University of California

In other words, the list is not complete. “Transportation Planning”, “Urban Design”, etc.), but are likely city/urban/regional planning scholars. Those not using these particular terms will not appear (e.g. The following is a list of all Google Scholar Profiles with areas of interest labeled as “Urban Planning,” “Urban and Regional Planning,” “City Planning,” “Spatial Planning,” and “Regional Planning” by profile owners. Please let me know if you have questions or comments – 20 Most Frequently Mentioned Profile Labels Provided below the figure is a link to the raw edge data I pulled into Gephi.

The most popular was “Urban Planning” used by 61% of the profiles, followed by “Spatial Planning” used by 13% of profiles, and “Urban and Regional Planning” used by 9% of profiles. The top 20 labels (shown below) accounted for 41% of the total mentions and the top 100 accounted for 57%. Overall, there were 3,465 unique (raw) labels used which resulted in an extensive network. This includes some analyses using the (old) ACSP Guide to Planning Education, “ Mapping the Knowledge Domain of Planning,” Twitter data, “ Urban Planning Academics: Tweets and Citations,” and publication data, “ The Most Frequently Cited Topics in Urban Planning Scholarship.”īased on the Google Scholar Citation Profile data I assembled recently (see “ Urban/City Planning Google Scholar Profiles from Around the World”), I performed network analyses of co-mentioned tags or labels within the 3,684 profiles in the list. This is driven by the question, “What is planning?” The ‘conversation’ includes other modes of communications such as social media content, conference materials, and profile information generated by planning faculty. Instead, I use the information that I assemble to examine what is being published, where it is being published, and how it is being acknowledged within the ‘conversation’ that is urban planning scholarship.

My primary interest in tracking citations is not to create a leaderboard of scholars based on their productivity.

Blog rahmat azizol